Adobe names Anil Chakravarthy as chief executive from 1 December
Category: People & Leadership
By Emily Carter
Published: 2026-09-05T08:00:00.000Z
Chakravarthy takes over on 1 December after nearly seven years running Adobe's digital experience and field organisation. Shantanu Narayen, chief executive since 2007, becomes executive chair. The succession puts the enterprise side of Adobe in charge of the whole company.
Adobe has named Anil Chakravarthy as its next president and chief executive, effective 1 December 2026. Shantanu Narayen, who has run the company since 2007, becomes executive chair. Chakravarthy currently serves as president of Adobe's customer experience orchestration business and worldwide field operations. The choice says something specific about where Adobe thinks its next decade is decided. Chakravarthy did not come up through Creative Cloud. He joined Adobe in January 2020 to lead the digital experience business, took on worldwide field operations later that same year and was promoted to president in December 2021. Before Adobe he ran Informatica, an enterprise data management company. His background is enterprise data, enterprise sales and the marketing technology stack, not creative tools. That is the part of Adobe under the least immediate pressure from generative AI and the part where the company competes with Salesforce, Microsoft and Oracle rather than with a growing field of AI image and video tools. Handing the whole company to the executive who runs it is a statement that the enterprise business is the anchor. The pressure on the other side is real and well understood. Adobe's creative franchise has spent three years absorbing a shift in which the core task of many of its products, generating and editing images and video, became something a general-purpose model can do from a text prompt. Adobe's answer has been Firefly, commercially safe training data and deep integration into existing workflows, on the argument that professionals need version control, colour management, rights clearance and the rest of the production apparatus, not just generation. That argument has held better than the pessimists expected and is not settled. Narayen's record makes the transition harder to read than most. He took over in 2007 and executed one of the more successful business model changes in enterprise software, moving Adobe from selling boxed perpetual licences to a subscription company, then acquiring Omniture, Marketo and Magento to build a marketing and commerce business alongside the creative one. Under him Adobe grew from a design software company into something closer to a two-sided platform. Staying on as executive chair rather than leaving entirely keeps that institutional memory in the room, which is usually a stabilising choice and occasionally an ambiguous one about where authority sits. For the region, Adobe's Saudi position gives the succession local relevance. At LEAP 2026 Adobe was part of an arrangement with the Ministry of Communications and Information Technology and HUMAIN to make AI tools available to Saudi residents, a programme valued at $4 billion covering access for 27 million people, alongside work on a culturally tuned model. That is one of the largest commitments any Western software company has made in the Kingdom, and it was made under the outgoing chief executive. Whether the incoming one treats it as a priority is a reasonable question and one the company has not addressed. What has not been disclosed is the shape of the leadership team beneath the change. Adobe has not said who succeeds Chakravarthy running the digital experience business and field operations, whether the creative and document businesses report differently under the new structure, or what the executive chair role covers in practice. Those details usually arrive over the following quarter and they determine how much of a change this actually is. The first real test is the earnings call after 1 December, and specifically whether the emphasis shifts. A chief executive from the enterprise side taking over a company whose brand rests on its creative products has to decide which story he is telling investors, and the two are not the same story.