alfanar wants to build the equipment Saudi data centres run on, not just the buildings

Category: Cloud, Infra & Data Centers

By Raza

Published: 2026-09-03T09:15:00.000Z

A $150m commitment to manufacture data-centre components in the Kingdom is small next to the halls being built. It addresses a different constraint from the one the megawatt figures describe.

alfanar announced a $150m investment to manufacture data-centre components inside Saudi Arabia on the third day of LEAP 2026, with the stated aim of raising local content in the equipment the Kingdom's data centres consume. Two things need saying about the number before it is used. The first is that it appears in the event's day-three investment roundup and the wire coverage carrying it, with no alfanar statement, no product list, no site and no timetable. That roundup also presented a fund established in March 2024 as a new announcement, so the figure carries less weight than a corporate release would. The second is that alfanar separately committed $1.4bn to develop four Saudi data centres, and that was announced at LEAP 2025. It is a different commitment to a different thing, and adding the two together would overstate what has been said. With that established, the announcement is interesting for what it is not. Almost everything committed at this event was capacity: halls, megawatts, cooling, land. This is a commitment to make the things that go inside them. That distinction matters more in Saudi Arabia than it would elsewhere, because of the sequence the Kingdom is building in. Al Moammar Information Systems has committed $1.2bn to reach 192 megawatts. NHC Innovation put SAR 3.3bn behind a district-scale development at Khuzam. stc's center3 set out capacity starting at 250 megawatts. Every one of those projects consumes switchgear, transformers, busways, power distribution units, cooling plant and racks in quantity, and almost all of that is currently imported. An importer of electrical infrastructure is exposed to shipping schedules and lead times set on the other side of the world. Data-centre electrical equipment has been among the tightest supply categories globally for several years, with quoted lead times on some switchgear running well beyond a year. A developer that has signed a power agreement and broken ground can still be held up by a transformer. alfanar is a plausible party to address that. It is a Saudi industrial group whose core business is electrical manufacturing, and it already runs a Riyadh plant producing HPE ProLiant servers under the Saudi Made programme — a line that moved to HPE's current Gen12 generation in the week before LEAP. A company that makes electrical equipment and assembles servers is positioned across most of what a data centre needs that is not the building itself. The size is worth reading honestly. At $150m this is a manufacturing investment, not an industrial policy. Against the several billions committed to Saudi data-centre capacity in this event alone, it would supply a share of demand rather than the whole of it. What it changes is the local-content position of the projects that can buy from it, which is a procurement advantage rather than a supply guarantee. It also fits a pattern TechScoop has set out separately, in which foreign and domestic manufacturers alike chose to produce inside the Kingdom this week rather than ship into it. What distinguishes this commitment within that group is the category. The others are making computers. This is making the electrical plant that powers and cools them, which is the part of a data centre with the longest lead time and the fewest alternative suppliers. The question these commitments raise together is whether they become an industrial base or remain a set of individual lines. That depends on something none of the announcements addresses: whether the large domestic buyers actually purchase from them at volume once the capacity exists. The data-centre developers committing billions this week are the natural customers, and none of them has said publicly what share of equipment they intend to source in-Kingdom. TechScoop looked for a version of this commitment before publishing its LEAP 2026 analysis and could not find one, so the claim was left out. It now has a source, and the source is thin. An alfanar statement naming the products and the plant would settle it.